A Faceless Experiment: A Corporate Gamble at the Cost of Incarcerated Lives

Would you be interested in reading a quarterly magazine that boldly explores issues within incarceration? Join the conversation. Your voice helps shape the narratives that matter. Log-In to Thrive to cast your vote.

In an alarming and deeply unsettling revelation, Made Magazine has learned through an anonymous tip that Ramsey County Adult Detention Center has recently installed vending machines equipped with facial recognition software. This move, under the guise of modernizing the correctional experience, raises serious ethical, legal, and constitutional questions regarding the treatment of incarcerated individuals and their right to privacy. Inmates at Ramsey County Jail are presumed innocent, awaiting trial or sentencing, yet they are being subjected to corporate experimentation at the cost of their dignity and civil liberties.

The installation of facial recognition technology in vending machines, which inmates use to purchase food or snacks, represents a disturbing expansion of surveillance practices that blur the lines between “correction” and exploitation. If individuals who are in jail to await court decisions are forced to undergo facial recognition just to obtain food, what rights are they left with? These people, whose very status in the justice system is that of an alleged offender, are still entitled to the same civil rights and protections as any citizen under the Constitution. So why is it necessary for them to submit to facial recognition in exchange for something as basic as food?

Is This About Correction or Corporate Profits?

The move to introduce facial recognition in a setting where individuals have not been convicted of any crime is chilling. What part of “correction” does this technology serve? Should we now expect the criminal justice system to act as a testing ground for invasive corporate technology? The prison-industrial complex is already a multi-billion-dollar industry, and it seems this move is a direct effort to fuel corporate profits by expanding surveillance and data collection. But what happens to the data? Who has access to it, and how could it be used against inmates?

According to sources, the facial recognition software is malfunctioning, leaving inmates in a lurch—unable to access the vending machines and left to rely on meager, substandard meals. For many incarcerated individuals, the vending machine may be the only alternative to inadequate prison meals. To deny them this basic human right is not just a mistake; it’s an ethical breach. When families of incarcerated individuals are already facing the trauma of separation, adding the possibility of faulty technology and denial of food makes this situation even more egregious.

What About the Law?

Let’s turn to the legal side of this issue. Is there a law that mandates the installation of facial recognition software in vending machines, particularly in jails that house individuals who have not yet been convicted? The answer is no. There is no legal requirement to subject inmates to facial recognition to access food or services, yet this technology is being introduced with little to no oversight or legal justification.

In fact, there are growing concerns across the country about the use of facial recognition technology in prisons and jails, especially in light of its potential to disproportionately target marginalized communities. According to the ACLU, there have been numerous cases of inaccurate facial recognition software leading to wrongful identifications, which is even more problematic when applied in a correctional setting. The dangers of such errors are compounded by the current lack of transparency and oversight about how this data is being used.

The Dangers of Facial Recognition Technology

Facial recognition is a highly contentious technology that has been proven to be inaccurate and biased. As discussed in reports by organizations such as the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) and the ACLU, the software often struggles to correctly identify Black and Brown individuals, increasing the risk of wrongful detainment, misidentification, and other civil rights violations. In fact, studies have shown that the error rates for facial recognition software are much higher for people of color, leading to disproportionate targeting.

In a prison or jail setting, this can have devastating consequences. Misidentifications or errors in recognizing inmates can lead to wrongful punishments, unjust security protocols, and further alienation from families. Furthermore, if the software malfunctions or is unreliable, it further undermines the ability of inmates to access basic needs. What’s happening at Ramsey County Jail is not just a minor technical oversight—it is a systematic failure that risks further marginalizing the most vulnerable members of society.

The Bigger Picture: The Prison-Industrial Complex

This latest development raises fundamental questions about the moral integrity of the prison system itself. Are we moving further away from the rehabilitative goals of incarceration and deeper into the profit-driven machinery of mass imprisonment? The idea of incarcerating Americans, many of whom have not been convicted, and subjecting them to corporate-controlled experiments is a disturbing trend. The combination of profit-making schemes and technology-driven surveillance is a recipe for further exploitation, especially when combined with the ongoing issue of underfunded, understaffed, and outdated prison infrastructure.

This situation is part of a broader pattern in which incarcerated individuals are treated not as citizens with rights but as data points to be exploited for financial gain. This commodification of human beings—many of whom are awaiting trial, not serving sentences—raises the question: is this moral? Have we lost sight of the original purpose of incarceration?

In an age where the United States has the highest incarceration rate in the world, with millions of Americans behind bars, it is time we confront the ethical and human rights implications of this system. The use of facial recognition in this context is not just a technological advancement—it is a reflection of a deeper issue: the normalization of surveillance and control over the lives of those already marginalized.

A Call to Action

What is happening in Ramsey County Adult Detention Center cannot be ignored. The introduction of facial recognition technology in vending machines violates the basic principles of privacy, dignity, and human rights. It is time to ask: at what cost are we allowing the prison-industrial complex to expand? Are we really willing to sacrifice the civil liberties of those who are still presumed innocent in the name of corporate profit?

We must always demand accountability from those in power—we never know if we or someone we love could become the powerless. What would we hope for if we were to find ourselves in a powerless situation? There needs to be immediate oversight and transparency regarding how this data is being collected, stored, and used. There needs to be conversation about the ethics of creating barriers to food. If we truly care about justice and fairness, we must remain vigilant and transparent concerning the exploitation of incarcerated Americans and work toward a system that values rehabilitation and human dignity over profits and destruction.

As we continue to grapple with the inherent flaws in our criminal justice system, one thing is clear: the path toward reform must begin by rejecting the commodification of human lives. This is not just about protecting the rights of the incarcerated; it is about protecting the very soul of our society.

WOULD YOU LIKE TO SEE MORE INSIDER ARTICLES LIKE THIS? TAKE THE POLL